Fraud SoftwareDesk / 2026
Compare tools Editor’s Choice

Testing directory

Fraud checkers and live demos

Try browser-risk checks, IP lookups and payment sandbox cases. Match each test to the evidence you need before evaluating a complete fraud platform.

By Victor Huang · Updated October 23, 2026

ShieldLabs

Inspect the evidence behind this visit.

Record the regular-browser result, then change one condition: private window or a permitted VPN connection. Compare the identity references and named signals separately.

Run Anonymity Checker

Fingerprint

See how network context changes an action.

Repeat the same workflow after switching a permitted VPN exit. Inspect the visible response rather than assuming it exposes every underlying signal.

Try VPN detection demo

Find a test

Choose the evidence layer.

Browser tests assess a visit or demonstrate a workflow. IP tools inspect an address. Sandbox cases exercise an integration.

6 of 6 testing options

Browser and session check

ShieldLabs Anonymity Checker

Inspect the evidence behind this visit.

Output. Device and visitor identifiers, connection context, named risk signals and visit risk score.

Record the regular-browser result, then change one condition: private window or a permitted VPN connection. Compare the identity references and named signals separately.

Access and scope. Public visit-based demo. It collects the visit on the provider’s site; account-linked events require a product integration.

Run Anonymity Checker Read our ShieldLabs review →
Browser workflow demonstration

Fingerprint VPN detection demo

See how network context changes an action.

Output. A regional-pricing scenario driven by the current connection’s VPN assessment.

Repeat the same workflow after switching a permitted VPN exit. Inspect the visible response rather than assuming it exposes every underlying signal.

Access and scope. Public interactive workflow. This is one product scenario, not a test of all fraud types or production detection rates.

Try VPN detection demo
IP reputation lookup

IPQualityScore IP lookup

Inspect IP-level risk and anonymization.

Output. IP reputation, proxy/VPN and related network information exposed by the public lookup.

Use an IP you control. Record the address, timestamp, exact field names and missing fields before comparing another provider.

Access and scope. The public tool returned an access block in our automated browser on October 23, 2026. Try a normal browser; current fields and lookup results were not confirmed. Website availability and production API allowances are separate.

Open IP risk lookup
Network identity lookup

IPinfo IP lookup

Identify the network behind a connection.

Output. Public IP, location, ASN and network information available in the visiting-IP view.

Use the same connection and timestamp as the risk test. Compare factual network fields; a location or ASN is not a fraud verdict.

Access and scope. Public network information; additional intelligence fields can depend on product access or login.

Open IPinfo lookup
IP classification lookup

proxycheck.io lookup

Compare connection classification.

Output. The lookup’s available proxy/VPN, hosting and risk-related fields for the selected address.

Keep the exact IP fixed while comparing classifications. Record whether the field is missing, not assessed or negative.

Access and scope. Public lookup. Separate website testing availability from API quotas, fields and commercial terms.

Open proxycheck.io lookup
Account-based payment sandbox

Stripe Radar test cases

Exercise a payment-risk integration safely.

Output. Documented test-mode outcomes for the selected Radar setup, including rule and review behavior where enabled.

Use a Stripe test account and official test data. Keep the simulated payment outcome separate from a live authorization or actual fraudulent transaction.

Access and scope. Requires account access and test mode. Use test data only; higher-plan features remain plan-specific.

Open Radar testing guide Read our Stripe review →

Repeatable testing

Keep one variable in view.

  1. Record the baseline: provider, timestamp, assessed entity, available fields and scale.
  2. Change one permitted condition, such as a private window or network exit, and repeat the same action.
  3. Compare identity, network flags and current risk independently. Preserve missing or unavailable results.
  4. Include legitimate users and shared networks before applying restrictions in a real flow.

Move from a public test to the controlled evaluation guide when choosing a product.

Full-platform evaluations

When the next step is an assisted demo.

These routes arrange product access. They are not public fraud checkers. Ask for the actual fields, data requirements, test environment and commercial scope.

FAQ

Does this directory run a fraud check?

No. It links to tests on each provider’s site. The provider controls collection, output and access. No third-party checker or identification SDK is embedded in this directory.

Can a free fraud checker validate a whole platform?

A public check shows a limited result for a browser visit, IP address or test payment. Evaluate a complete platform on permitted, representative events with legitimate controls, known abuse cases and delayed outcomes.

Why do different checkers return different risk scores?

They can use different signals, refresh cycles, definitions, scales and assessed entities. A browser-session score, an IP classification and a payment decision are different outputs; record the fields and scope before comparing them.

Does a VPN flag mean the customer is fraudulent?

No. VPNs, corporate networks and privacy services are also used legitimately. Assess the signal alongside device, account and transaction evidence, then choose a response that fits the protected action.

Summarize this page with